Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

Competing needs like need for sufficient workforce levels to offer quality care services to patients against limited resources can impact healthcare organizations. The competing needs may impact policy development since the agenda advocated by the said policy should align with these aspects. For instance, a policy addressing sufficient levels of workforce and patient safety may require organizations to allocate additional resources to the course to help improve outcomes (Haryanto, 2019). Effective use of available workforce leads to the provision of quality, and cost-effective services to patients to meet their care needs. However, getting sufficient workforce may be difficult due to the resources required leading to a shortage of providers.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

Specific Competing Needs and Impact on Nurse Shortage

Nursing shortage is a critical healthcare issue that is affected by an effective fit between an organization’s operating cost and patients’ needs based on the quality and safety of care. As such, organizations are seeking ways to attain a balance between nurse staffing and patient needs. Through this approach, they can sustain operational costs while providing safe and quality care (Livanos, 2018). Organizations should align nursing capacity with the patients’ needs to attain better outcomes. They can attain this by having effective distribution of resources and nurses in all departments thus ensure that the workload is equal among practitioners.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Impact and How Policy can address competing Needs

The amount of workload for each nurse impacts patients’ and staff’s needs. Increased workload also affects working and efficiency of an organization and nurses. These include high vulnerability to adverse events like medication errors due to fatigue and burnout. Nurses may also feel dissatisfied by their jobs leading to high turnover. Organizational policies like hiring of temporary nurses can help address these competing needs (Manz et al., 2021). Such a policy improves nurse staffing levels and ratios to patients leading to optimal care delivery and better patient outcomes.

References

Haryanto, M. (2019). Nursing shortage: myth or fact? Orthopedic Nursing, 38(1), 1-2.

Livanos, N. (2018). A Broadening Coalition: Patient Safety Enters the Nurse-To-Patient Ration

Debate. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 9(1), 68-70.

DOI:10.1016/S2155-8256(18)30056-5

Manz, J., Williams, K., Jessen, J., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2021). Addressing the perioperative

nursing shortage via a perioperative nursing preceptorship for baccalaureate nursing students. AORN journal, 113(1), 52-63. DOI: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000535.

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES TO SUPPORT HEALTHCARE ISSUESQuite often, nurse leaders are faced with ethical dilemmas, such as those associated with choices between competing needs and limited resources. Resources are finite, and competition for those resources occurs daily in all organizations.

For example, the use of 12-hour shifts has been a strategy to retain nurses. However, evidence suggests that as nurses work more hours in a shift, they commit more errors. How do effective leaders find a balance between the needs of the organization and the needs of ensuring quality, effective, and safe patient care?

In this Discussion, you will reflect on a national healthcare issue and examine how competing needs may impact the development of polices to address that issue.

RESOURCES

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and think about the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously selected for study in Module 1.
  • Reflect on the competing needs in healthcare delivery as they pertain to the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously examined.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 3

Post an explanation of how competing needs, such as the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients, may impact the development of policy. Then, describe any specific competing needs that may impact the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected. What are the impacts, and how might policy address these competing needs? Be specific and provide examples.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by providing additional thoughts about competing needs that may impact your colleagues’ selected issues, or additional ideas for applying policy to address the impacts described.

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting
50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. …Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44 to >39.0 ptsGood

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39 to >34.0 ptsFair

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

34 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Post: Timeliness
10 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Posts main post by day 3.

0 ptsPoor

Does not post by day 3.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response
18 to >16.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16 to >14.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 to >12.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response
17 to >15.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 to >13.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 to >11.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
5 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Week 3 Discussion: Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1(256) 743-6183
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?