NURS 6053 Leadership Theories in Practice Essay

NURS 6053 Leadership Theories in Practice Essay

NURS 6053 Leadership Theories in Practice Sample Essay

Here are the two scholarly resources that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments:

• Bannay, D. F., Hadi, M. J., & Amanah, A. A. (2020). The impact of inclusive leadership behaviors on innovative workplace behavior with an emphasis on the mediating role of work engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 479. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammed-Hadi-9/publication/344669338_The_impact_of_inclusive_leadership_behaviors_on_innovative_workplace_behavior_with_an_emphasis_on_the_mediating_role_of_work_engagement_AUTHORS_ARTICLE_INFO_NUMBER_OF_REFERENCES_45_NUMBER_OF_FIGURES_2/links/5f88360ea6fdccfd7b62b19f/The-impact-of-inclusive-leadership-behaviors-on-innovative-workplace-behavior-with-an-emphasis-on-the-mediating-role-of-work-engagement-AUTHORS-ARTICLE-INFO-NUMBER-OF-REFERENCES-45-NUMBER-OF-FIGURES-2.pdf
• Vidman, Å., & Strömberg, A. (2020). Leadership for a healthy work environment–a question about who, what and how. Leadership in Health Services, 34(1), 1-15. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHS-06-2020-0041/full/pdf

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; NURS 6053 Leadership Theories in Practice Essay

One of the main the main lesson I have gained from the two scholarly sources is that effective leadership involves showcasing high level of emotional awareness or emotional intelligence. I have also learned that leaders with charismatic and inclusive behaviors create a healthy work environment that allows everyone to succeed. Leadership requires a deep level of understanding and connection with the people one is leading and overseeing, making emotional intelligence an essential quality for successful leadership (Efimov et al., 2020). Research has shown that leaders possessing a high level of emotional awareness benefit from better relationships amongst their employees, as well as increased performance and productivity (Bannay et al., 2020). They also demonstrate more inspiring, innovative, and fair behavior which in turn creates a healthier work environment. Not only does this prove beneficial to the team dynamics but it can motivate individual employees to perform at a higher level (Vidman & Strömberg, 2020). This insight highlights the importance of having leaders with strong emotional intelligence who can make sound decisions based on their understanding of interpersonal relationships in the workplace.

One instance where I have seen emotional intelligence and inclusive leadership behaviors in practice was at a team-building workshop organized by the company I used to work for. The facilitator employed creative techniques to encourage open communication among employees of varying positions and seniority levels. In particular, they shared the importance of valuing and respecting different viewpoints, which provided a safe environment for all participants to share without fear of judgement. For example, the facilitator encouraged everyone to introduce themselves with a personal fact; this succeeded in fostered an atmosphere of understanding and unity between attendees. Undoubtedly, it was a powerful illustration of how effective emotional intelligence is when it comes to creating an inclusive working environment.

The emotional intelligence and inclusive leadership behaviors discussed in the workshop were all highly beneficial for company operations. The workshop was effective in bridging any gaps between employees from different departments, ages or seniority, leading to improved collaboration and better team results. Furthermore, the welcoming work atmosphere created by these practices promoted a high level of respect amongst colleagues no matter their background or position, thus raising morale and fostering job satisfaction. All in all, these leadership behaviors are essential for companies looking to reap the rewards of a strong, unified and successful team.

References

Bannay, D. F., Hadi, M. J., & Amanah, A. A. (2020). The impact of inclusive leadership behaviors on innovative workplace behavior with an emphasis on the mediating role of work engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 479. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammed-Hadi-9/publication/344669338_The_impact_of_inclusive_leadership_behaviors_on_innovative_workplace_behavior_with_an_emphasis_on_the_mediating_role_of_work_engagement_AUTHORS_ARTICLE_INFO_NUMBER_OF_REFERENCES_45_NUMBER_OF_FIGURES_2/links/5f88360ea6fdccfd7b62b19f/The-impact-of-inclusive-leadership-behaviors-on-innovative-workplace-behavior-with-an-emphasis-on-the-mediating-role-of-work-engagement-AUTHORS-ARTICLE-INFO-NUMBER-OF-REFERENCES-45-NUMBER-OF-FIGURES-2.pdf

Efimov, I., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2020). Health-oriented self-and employee leadership in virtual teams: A qualitative study with virtual leaders. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(18), 6519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186519

Vidman, Å., & Strömberg, A. (2020). Leadership for a healthy work environment–a question about who, what and how. Leadership in Health Services, 34(1), 1-15. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHS-06-2020-0041/full/pdf

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; NURS 6053 Leadership Theories in Practice Essay

LEADERSHIP THEORIES IN PRACTICE

A walk through the Business section of any bookstore or a quick Internet search on the topic will reveal a seemingly endless supply of writings on leadership. Formal research literature is also teeming with volumes on the subject.

However, your own observation and experiences may suggest these theories are not always so easily found in practice. Not that the potential isn’t there; current evidence suggests that leadership factors such as emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behaviors, for example, can be highly effective for leading nurses and organizations.

Yet, how well are these theories put to practice? In this Discussion, you will examine formal leadership theories. You will compare these theories to behaviors you have observed firsthand and discuss their effectiveness in impacting your organization.

RESOURCES

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and examine the leadership theories and behaviors introduced.
• Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
• Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 4

Post two key insights you had from the scholarly resources you selected. Describe a leader whom you have seen use such behaviors and skills, or a situation where you have seen these behaviors and skills used in practice. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain to what extent these skills were effective and how their practice impacted the workplace.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 4

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by explaining how the leadership skills they described may impact your organization or your personal leadership, or by identifying challenges you see in applying the skills described.

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; NURS 6053 Leadership Theories in Practice Essay

NURS_6053_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting	50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 44 to >39.0 ptsGood Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 39 to >34.0 ptsFair Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors. 34 to >0 ptsPoor Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.	50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Post: Timeliness	10 to >0.0 ptsExcellent Posts main post by day 3. 0 ptsPoor Does not post by day 3.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response	18 to >16.0 ptsExcellent Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 16 to >14.0 ptsGood Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 14 to >12.0 ptsFair Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 12 to >0 ptsPoor Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.	18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response	17 to >15.0 ptsExcellent Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 15 to >13.0 ptsGood Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 13 to >11.0 ptsFair Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 11 to >0 ptsPoor Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.	17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation	5 to >0.0 ptsExcellent Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. 0 ptsPoor Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.	5 pts
Total Points: 100