Assignment; Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

 Assignment; Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

 Assignment; Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

The difference and complexity of healthcare issues obligate healthcare professionals to use diverse interventions in their respective settings. Nurse leaders formulate different policies to respond to healthcare issues/stressors that hamper patient outcomes. However, policy development is not straightforward due to competing needs. These needs represent areas of concern (competing priorities) that should be addressed instantaneously amid limited resources (Feldacker et al., 2020). As a result, nurse leaders and other policymakers must develop policy interventions that balance organizational resources and deprive one area of the resources needed for optimal performance while responding to another area. Planning, designing, and formulating these policies should also follow the central tenets of efficiency to avoid resource wastage.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON; Assignment; Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

The competing needs of the workforce, resources, and patients may impact interventions designed to respond to a nursing shortage. If not effectively addressed, a nursing shortage could lead to a workforce shortage due to burnout and increased turnover intention (Kelly et al., 2021). Competing needs likely to impact this issue include an adequate workforce, organizational financial resources, and the need for mentally and physically optimal nurses. An adequate workforce is critical for the timely and comprehensive delivery of patient care (Poku et al., 2022). Such care cannot be achieved without adequate support programs for nurses’ health and well-being. However, limited organizational resources may hamper an organization’s ability to invest in and sustain such programs.

The impacts of competing needs are far-reaching since nurse leaders must redesign how patient care is offered amid limited resources. A policy might address these competing needs through an intervention that optimizes nurses’ health and well-being without significantly affecting the limited financial resources. For instance, a zero-tolerance policy for bullying effectively prevents workplace bullying/violence, hence preventing nurse turnover (Cherry & Jacobs, 2021). It helps nurses to work amid stressors without intending to leave, resulting in care continuity and patient satisfaction. The intensity of a nursing shortage determines the policy type and implementation time.

References

Cherry, B., & Jacob, S. R. (2021). Contemporary nursing e-book: Issues, trends, & management. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Feldacker, C., Murenje, V., Makunike-Chikwinya, B., Hove, J., Munyaradzi, T., Marongwe, P., … & Barnhart, S. (2020). Balancing competing priorities: Quantity versus quality within a routine, voluntary medical male circumcision program operating at scale in Zimbabwe. PloS one, 15(10), e0240425. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240425

Kelly, L. A., Gee, P. M., & Butler, R. J. (2021). Impact of nurse burnout on organizational and position turnover. Nursing Outlook, 69(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.008

Poku, C. A., Donkor, E., & Naab, F. (2022). Impacts of nursing work environment on turnover intentions: the mediating role of burnout in Ghana. Nursing Research and Practice, 2022, 1310508. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1310508

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; Assignment; Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

Quite often, nurse leaders are faced with ethical dilemmas, such as those associated with choices between competing needs and limited resources. Resources are finite, and competition for those resources occurs daily in all organizations.

For example, the use of 12-hour shifts has been a strategy to retain nurses. However, evidence suggests that as nurses work more hours in a shift, they commit more errors. How do effective leaders find a balance between the needs of the organization and the needs of ensuring quality, effective, and safe patient care?

In this Discussion, you will reflect on a national healthcare issue and examine how competing needs may impact the development of polices to address that issue.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and think about the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously selected for study in Module 1.
• Reflect on the competing needs in healthcare delivery as they pertain to the national healthcare issue/stressor you previously examined.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 3

Post an explanation of how competing needs, such as the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients, may impact the development of policy. Then, describe any specific competing needs that may impact the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected. What are the impacts, and how might policy address these competing needs? Be specific and provide examples.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by providing additional thoughts about competing needs that may impact your colleagues’ selected issues, or additional ideas for applying policy to address the impacts described.

BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON; Assignment; Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Essay

NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric

NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting	50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. …Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 44 to >39.0 ptsGood Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 39 to >34.0 ptsFair Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors. 34 to >0 ptsPoor Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.	50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Post: Timeliness	10 to >0.0 ptsExcellent Posts main post by day 3. 0 ptsPoor Does not post by day 3.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response	18 to >16.0 ptsExcellent Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 16 to >14.0 ptsGood Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 14 to >12.0 ptsFair Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 12 to >0 ptsPoor Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.	18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response	17 to >15.0 ptsExcellent Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 15 to >13.0 ptsGood Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 13 to >11.0 ptsFair Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 11 to >0 ptsPoor Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.	17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation	5 to >0.0 ptsExcellent Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. 0 ptsPoor Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.	5 pts
Total Points: 100