NURS 8310 Week 3 Assignment 1: Selecting a Population Health Problem Essay
NURS 8310 Week 3 Assignment 1: Selecting a Population Health Problem Essay
Selecting Population Health Problem
Studying a health problem within a particular population requires adequate preparation of all factors that would lead to reliable results. Epidemiology studies offer important information use in carrying out further research. Central to the epidemiology study are the person, place, and time signifying the people affected by the condition, the place of the incidence, and the time. Therefore, this study aims at discussing the prevalence of Tuberculosis (TB) among African Americans.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE ON;NURS 8310 Week 3 Assignment 1: Selecting a Population Health Problem Essay
Outline of the Environment
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NURS 8310 Week 3 Assignment 1: Selecting a Population Health Problem Essay
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Various personal characteristics tend and behaviors have an important role in examining a health status and might be treated as exposures or risk factors considered in undertaking the study. In the study of TB among African Americans, age, sex and ethnicity will be some of the important variables of interest in the study (Yap et al., 2018). This is because the frequency of the health outcome can vary depending on these characteristics. However, in this case, the researcher would take the initiative of thinking broadly about other personal features that might affect the health issue (Moss et al., 2020). The ethnic background and family health records would be some of the important variables that would define the outcome of an increase or decrease of TB among African Americans.
The variation in the location is another factor that relays more information about the prevalence of TB among the selected population. The geographic location of the selected population provides etiology data of the health issue (Pagaoa et al., 2017). The geographical location that exposes blacks to TB such as overcrowding because of homelessness is one of the features that would be considered in the study. The conditions and association of people in a particular location affect the increased TB spread among the selected population. For instance, close contact situation is one of the risk factors of TB and location might define how close people are to each other.
Public health in the US always provides data of numerous health concerns overtime and this is always important in determining trends of TB on African Americans over time. The study would be examining how the frequency of TB has been varying over the decades and project the likely effect that the trend would depict in the future (Bennett et al., 2018).
Significance of the Health Problem
TB increases the death rate of both adults and children across the globe. The disease that kills both young and adult population hits the nation differently as it robs the country’s potential generation. The need to protect the future current and generation from eradication calls for effective research studies that would aid in examining TB in the US. The frequency of TB among African Americans changed from 7 cases to 3.4 cases per 100000 persons in the last decade (Marks et al., 2019). The rate at which new cases of TB are registered is worrying calling for effective intervention to solve the problem. Currently, TB is the second leading cause of death globally with 1.5 million deaths annually. This data reveals the worrying levels of TB in the US and across the world (Blumberg, 2020). Therefore, there is a need to develop an intervention that would counter the increased cases of TB and raise awareness on the significance of practicing prevention measures in countering TB.
Research Question
What is the prevalence of TB among African Americans?
Conclusion
TB has been one of the increasing health concerns in the US that have attracted numerous empirical studies in examining its underlying cause among African Americans. The selection of this health problem as a problem under investigation is important in designing the most effective solution for the current TB problem in the US.
References
Bennett, D. E., Courval, J. M., Onorato, I., Agerton, T., Gibson, J. D., Lambert, L., … & Castro, K. G. (2018). Prevalence of tuberculosis infection in the United States population: the national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999–2000. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 177(3), 348-355. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200701-057OC
Blumberg, S. (2020). An Overview of the Redesigned National Health Interview Survey. In APHA’s 2020 VIRTUAL Annual Meeting and Expo (Oct. 24-28). American Public Health Association.
Marks, S. M., Katz, D. J., Davidow, A. L., Pagaoa, M. A., Teeter, L. D., & Graviss, E. A. (2019). The impact of HIV infection on TB disparities among US-born Black and White tuberculosis patients in the United States. Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097%2FPHH.0000000000000949.
Moss, A. R., Hahn, J. A., Tulsky, J. P., Daley, C. L., Small, P. M., & Hopewell, P. C. (2020). Tuberculosis in the homeless: a prospective study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 162(2), 460-464. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.2.9910055
Pagaoa, M. A., Royce, R. A., Chen, M. P., Golub, J. E., Davidow, A. L., Hirsch-Moverman, Y., … & Tuberculosis Epidemiologic Studies Consortium. (2017). Risk factors for transmission of tuberculosis among United States-born African Americans and Whites. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 19(12), 1485-1492. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0965
Yap, P., Tan, K. H. X., Lim, W. Y., Barkham, T., Tan, L. W. L., Mark, I., … & Chee, C. B. E. (2018). Prevalence of and risk factors associated with latent tuberculosis in Singapore: a cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 72, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.05.004
BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON;NURS 8310 Week 3 Assignment 1: Selecting a Population Health Problem Essay
To complete:
Write a 1- to 2-page paper that addresses the following:
Describe the population health problem in terms of person, place, and time.
From the primary research literature and Healthy People 2020, briefly explain the significance of this health problem.
Include your preliminary research question or hypothesis.
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population Health
Major Assessment 7: Using an Epidemiological Approach to Critically Analyze a
Population Health Issue
Program LO: 1
1: Scholar/Evidence-Based Practitioner
Program LO: 6
6: Health Care Providers
DNP Essential: 3
3: Clinical Scholarship and Analytical Methods for Evidence-Based Practice
DNP Essential: 7
7: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health
BUY A CUSTOM-PAPER HERE ON;NURS 8310 Week 3 Assignment 1: Selecting a Population Health Problem Essay
(Scroll down for table)
| ASSIGNMENT PROMPT | Target
5 points |
Acceptable
3 points |
Unacceptable
1 point |
Score/Level |
|
Using an Epidemiological Approach to Critically Analyze a Population Health Issue Section 1: The Problem (Application 2)
(5 points)
Program LO: 1
DNP Essential: 3, 7 |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment using advanced critical thinking skills. Discussion includes: · A brief outline of the environment you selected (i.e., home, workplace, school) · A summary of the selected population health problem, including a description of the characteristics of the affected population, and the magnitude of the problem based on data from appropriate data resources · References to the data resources used · Research question/hypothesis Demonstrates content mastery using examples of, and/or personalized reflections about, the population health problem; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area.
Excels in meeting expectations for graduate-level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 1
Fully meets expectations for Essential 3 and 7 |
Well-developed, good-quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; demonstrates content mastery using examples of, and/or personalized reflections about, the population health problem; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Fully meets expectations for graduate-level work.
Meets expectations for LO 1
Meets expectations for Essential 3 and 7
|
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of the population health problem; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding.
Lags behind expectations for graduate-level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 1
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essential 3 or 7 |
|
| Section 2: Research Methods
(Application 2)
(5 points)
Program LO: 1, 6
DNP Essential: 3, 7 |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment using advanced critical thinking skills. Discussion includes: · The epidemiologic study design to assess and address the population health problem · Assessment strategies · Summary of the data collection activities
Creates a cogent explanation of the selected epidemiologic study design to assess. Demonstrates content mastery using sound epidemiologic principles, and/or personalized reflections about the content of the literature that supports the research design selection, assessment strategies, and data collection activities; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area.
Excels in meeting expectations for graduate-level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 1 and 6
Fully meets expectations for Essentials 3 and 7 |
Well-developed, good-quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; demonstrates content mastery using sound epidemiologic principles and/or personalized reflections about, the content of the literature; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Fully meets expectations for graduate-level work.
Meets expectations for LO 1 and 6
Meets expectations for Essentials 3 and 7
|
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Content needs substantial revision for it to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than 50% of the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature that support this section; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding.
Lags behind expectations for graduate-level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 1 and 6
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 3 and 7 |
|
| Section 3: The Intervention
(Application 3) (5 points)
Program LO: 1, 6 DNP Essential: 3, 7 |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment using advanced critical thinking skills. Discussion includes: · An outline of an intervention to address the population health problem with your selected population based on the results of the analytic study in Section 2 · A review of the literature that supports this intervention
Demonstrates content mastery outlining an appropriate intervention that is supported by the literature using examples of, and/or personalized reflections about, the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 2
Fully meets expectations for Essential 2 |
Well-developed good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some support for the suggested intervention based on the literature review; demonstrates content mastery using examples of, and/or personalized reflections about, the content of the literature review; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through personalized reflections about the content area.
Fully meets expectations for graduate-level work.
Meets expectations for LO 1 and 6
Meets expectations for Essentials 3 and 7
|
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Needs substantial revision to be worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses less than half the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of main ideas from the literature review; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding.
Lags behind expectations for graduate-level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 1 and 6
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 3 and 7 |
|
| Section 4: The Impact
(Application 3)
(5 points)
Program LO: 1, 6 DNP Essential: 3, 7 |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment using advanced critical thinking skills. Discussion includes: · An explanation of the health outcome and the social impact of solving this issue
Demonstrates content mastery using examples of and/or personalized reflections about the content based on the literature; demonstrates an applied level of understanding of the expected health outcome and social impact of solving the problem based on the epidemiologic literature. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate-level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 1 and 6
Fully meets expectations for Essential 3 and 7 |
Well-developed good quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; includes some explanation of health outcomes based on the literature; demonstrates content mastery using examples of the expected health outcome and social impact of solving the problem based on the epidemiologic literature.
Fully meets expectations for graduate-level work.
Meets expectations for LO 1 and 6
Meets expectations for Essential3 and 7
|
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Needs substantial revision to be worthy of a professional portfolio; addresses less than half the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; consists primarily of a summary of ideas from the literature; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding.
Lags behind expectations for graduate-level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 1 and 6
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essentials 3 or 7 |
|
| Section 5: Evaluation (Application 4)
(5 points)
Program LO: 1, 6
DNP Essential: 3, 7 |
Exemplary quality.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses every major subsection in the assignment; selects most appropriate evaluation method for the project and fully and clearly describes the method for evaluating the effect of the intervention using advanced critical thinking skills; demonstrates an applied level of understanding through reflections supported by the literature about the content area. Excels in meeting expectations for graduate-level work.
Fully meets expectations for LO 1 and 6
Fully meets expectations for Essential 3 and 7 |
Well-developed, good-quality work.
Content is of a professional portfolio quality; addresses at least 80% of the major subsections in the assignment using adequate critical thinking skills; selected evaluation method is sufficient for determining the effect of the intervention and description of evaluation method is adequate; demonstration of an applied level of understanding through reflections supported by the literature about the content area. It fully meets expectations for graduate-level work. Meets expectations for LO 1 and 6
Meets expectations for Essential 3 and 7
|
Superficially developed, unacceptable quality.
Needs substantial revision to be of a professional portfolio quality; addresses less than half the major subsections in the assignment using weak critical thinking skills; inappropriate evaluation method selected for the intervention and minimal description of evaluation method; does not demonstrate an applied level of understanding. Lags behind expectations for graduate-level work.
Insufficient to meet expectations for LO 1 and 6
Insufficient to meet expectations for Essential 3 and 7 |
NURS 8310 Epidemiology and Population Health
Major Assessment 7: Using an Epidemiological Approach to Critically Analyze a Population Health Issue
Write a 12- to 15-page paper that addresses the following:
Section 1: The Problem
- A brief outline of the environment you selected (i.e., home, workplace, school)
- A summary of your selected population health problem in terms of person, place, and time, and the magnitude of the problem based on data from appropriate data resources (Reference the data resources you used.)
- Research question/hypothesis
Section 2: Research Methods
- The epidemiologic study design you would use to assess and address your population health problem
- Assessment strategies (e., if you were conducting a case-control study, how would you select your cases and controls? Regarding the methods and tools you would use to make these selections, how is it convenient for you as the researcher or as the investigator to use this tool?)
- Summary of the data collection activities (i.e., how you would collect data—online survey, paper/pen, mailing)
Section 3: The Intervention
- An outline of an intervention you would implement to address the population health problem with your selected population based on the results of the study in Section 2. Note: If you selected a descriptive study design, you are still required to outline an intervention that might be developed based on future research.
- A review of the literature that supports this intervention
Section 4: The Impact
- An explanation of the health outcome you would be seeking and the social impact of solving this issue
Section 5: Evaluation
- An evaluation plan based upon the health outcome that you have chosen and your anticipated results
The Final Paper (with feedback incorporated) is due by Day 3 of Week 11
Your written assignments must follow APA guidelines. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from appropriate Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association to ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct.
Writing (5 points): Up to 5 points (20%) may be deducted for grammar and APA style errors.
(Total points possible: 25)
Struggling to meet your deadline ?
Get assistance on
NURS 8310 Week 3 Assignment 1: Selecting a Population Health Problem Essay
done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!